status

(redirected from statuses)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Encyclopedia.

challenge the status quo

To behave or do something in a way contrary to that which is generally accepted or expected. I love this filmmaker, his movies really challenge the status quo! It can be risky, but challenging the status quo can be a great way to get ahead in business.
See also: challenge, quo, status

the status quo

The condition or state of affairs as it already exists or operates. Despite their myriad promises, politicians are inevitably more interested in maintaining the status quo, which is more profitable for them and their corporate buddies.
See also: quo, status

status quo

The existing condition or state of affairs, as in We don't want to admit more singers to the chorus; we like the status quo. This term, Latin for "state in which," has been used in English since the early 1800s.
See also: quo, status

status symbol

A position or activity that allows one's social prestige to be displayed, as in She doesn't even drive; that car of hers is purely a status symbol. [Mid-1900s]
See also: status, symbol

the status ˈquo

(from Latin) the situation as it is now, or as it was before a recent change: The conservatives are keen to maintain the status quo.
See also: quo, status

a ˈstatus symbol

an expensive possession which shows people that you are rich: These cars are regarded as status symbols in Britain.
See also: status, symbol

status seeker

Someone who aspires to a higher socioeconomic level. Upward mobility have always been an aspect of American society, but it took sociologist Vance Packard's 1959 book The Status Seekers to give a name to people who strove to impress by acquiring and flaunting fashionable and expensive items and social cachet. Status seekers—the derogatory epithet quickly gained popularity—not only tried to keep up with the Jones, they wanted to leave the Jones behind.
See also: status
References in periodicals archive ?
The framework itself, its six constituent statuses, the actual relevance of the suggested interventions for each of these statuses, and the extent of applicability of the framework across diverse populations need to be empirically tested.
INCOME: a culturally inclusive and disability-sensitive framework for organizing career development concepts and interventions
Participants classified as foreclosed on the EOM-EIS-II had a 38% chance of also being classified as foreclosed on the EIPQ, with disagreements primarily involving assignment to the diffused and achieved statuses (36% each).
In ascending order of mean commitment score, the EOM-EIS-II statuses were ordered as follows: moratorium, diffused, foreclosed, and achieved.
For the ideological and interpersonal domain clusters, mean diffusion scores did not differ significantly between the foreclosed and moratorium statuses.
For both clusters, foreclosure scores were significantly higher in the foreclosed and diffused statuses than in the moratorium and achieved statuses.
In all three domain clusters, moratorium scores were lowest in the foreclosed and achieved statuses (which were not significantly different from one another in any cluster) and highest in the moratorium status.
In the interpersonal and overall domain clusters, achievement scores differed significantly among all pairs of statuses (in the ideological cluster, the moratorium and foreclosed statuses were not significantly different from one another).
Across domain clusters, participants assigned to the moratorium or achieved statuses were significantly more likely to be correctly classified (54% each) than were participants assigned to the diffused or foreclosed statuses (30% and 29%, respectively), [chi square](1) = 20.
The assumptions underlying the status model are that (a) the identity statuses should relate to exploration and commitment in ways consistent with the conceptual definitions of the statuses, and (b) status assignment procedures using exploration and commitment scores should yield results equivalent to those produced by algorithms using direct status measures.
The low levels of agreement and inaccuracy of prediction in the classification analyses did not support the status model and raised some important questions about the relationships of the statuses to their underlying dimensions.
Convergent validity in objective measures of identity status: implications for identity status theory
Idioms browser ?
Full browser ?