leave with

(redirected from leaves us with)

leave with

1. To depart some place while accompanying or being accompanied by someone. He arrived with Stacey, but I think he left with Lacey. A: "Where did you end up last night?" B: "I left with Mark and the guys to grab a bit to eat."
2. To allow someone or something to be in the custody of someone else. In this usage, a noun or pronoun can be used between "leave" and "with." We're leaving the kids with my mother-in-law this weekend. Can I leave my bike with you while I run in to buy some milk?
3. To allow someone to take responsibility for something. In this usage, a noun or pronoun can be used between "leave" and "with." A: "I'm just not sure how to tackle this problem." B: "Leave it with me, I'm sure I can think of something." Do you mind if I leave th9is project with you? I just have too much on my plate at the moment.
See also: leave
Farlex Dictionary of Idioms. © 2015 Farlex, Inc, all rights reserved.

leave someone or something with someone or something

to allow someone or something to remain with someone or something. Can I leave Jimmy with you while I shop? Do you mind if I leave my papers with the committee, just in case they have time to look at them?
See also: leave

leave with someone

to depart in the company of someone. I left with Frank early in the evening and did not see what happened to Tom and Edna. Mary is gone. She left with Gerald.
See also: leave
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
See also:
References in periodicals archive ?
That leaves us with SPEREDEK and Nigel Hawke's (above) decision to revert to hurdles could prove inspired.
But if naturalism leaves us with a new set of problems in place of our old and comforting myths, it also leaves us with a new opportunity to create meaning.
If the Winnipeg Statement is not classified as (false) doctrine pertaining to faith, it still leaves us with mistaken teaching on moral matters.
Such a broad approach in single volume without any broader commentary bringing this wide range of subjects together in some way leaves us with a melange of disparate elements rather than a stew of blended ingredients.
Which leaves us with repetition, sometimes in the form of metonomy (different objects, same desire), sometimes in the form of obsession-compulsion (same object, same desire).
The work leaves us with an impression of physical and spiritual loneliness and the sense that these human figures have a soul, lending them a higher purpose.