leave with (someone or something)

(redirected from leaves us with)

leave with (someone or something)

1. To depart some place while accompanying or being accompanied by someone. He arrived with Stacey, but I think he left with Lacey. A: "Where did you end up last night?" B: "I left with Mark and the guys to grab a bit to eat."
2. To allow someone or something to be in the custody of someone else. In this usage, a noun or pronoun can be used between "leave" and "with." We're leaving the kids with my mother-in-law this weekend. Can I leave my bike with you while I run in to buy some milk?
3. To allow someone to take responsibility for something. In this usage, a noun or pronoun can be used between "leave" and "with." A: "I'm just not sure how to tackle this problem." B: "Leave it with me, I'm sure I can think of something." Do you mind if I leave this project with you? I just have too much on my plate at the moment.
See also: leave
Farlex Dictionary of Idioms. © 2015 Farlex, Inc, all rights reserved.

leave someone or something with someone or something

to allow someone or something to remain with someone or something. Can I leave Jimmy with you while I shop? Do you mind if I leave my papers with the committee, just in case they have time to look at them?
See also: leave

leave with someone

to depart in the company of someone. I left with Frank early in the evening and did not see what happened to Tom and Edna. Mary is gone. She left with Gerald.
See also: leave
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
References in periodicals archive ?
That leaves us with SPEREDEK and Nigel Hawke's (above) decision to revert to hurdles could prove inspired.
But if naturalism leaves us with a new set of problems in place of our old and comforting myths, it also leaves us with a new opportunity to create meaning.
If the Winnipeg Statement is not classified as (false) doctrine pertaining to faith, it still leaves us with mistaken teaching on moral matters.
Such a broad approach in single volume without any broader commentary bringing this wide range of subjects together in some way leaves us with a melange of disparate elements rather than a stew of blended ingredients.
Which leaves us with repetition, sometimes in the form of metonomy (different objects, same desire), sometimes in the form of obsession-compulsion (same object, same desire).
The work leaves us with an impression of physical and spiritual loneliness and the sense that these human figures have a soul, lending them a higher purpose.