(redirected from coerces)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus.

coerce (one) into (something)

To force, compel, or threaten a person or animal to take a certain action. The maid coerced her famous employer into paying her an exorbitant sum of money. It took a lot of treats to coerce the cat into her carrier for a trip to the vet.
See also: coerce
Farlex Dictionary of Idioms. © 2022 Farlex, Inc, all rights reserved.

coerce (someone or an animal) into something

to force or compel someone or an animal to do something. I could not coerce her into coming along with us. You cannot coerce a cat into anything.
See also: coerce
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
See also:
References in periodicals archive ?
In one, Taiwan will restrict trade only if it is politics-first; in the other, China will coerce only if it is politics-first.
If a politics-first Taiwan believes that China is unlikely to coerce, it will risk trading with China.
If Taiwan chooses to liberalize trade, then China decides whether or not to coerce Taiwan.
Unlike the first two moves of the game, the moves following China's decision to coerce depend solely on each player's type.
The longer China takes to coerce Taiwan once trade has been liberalized, the more it signals that China is economics-first, in which case a politics-first Taiwan might be willing to sustain liberalized trade without fearing political vulnerability.
If China chose not to coerce, then eventually we would have to conclude that both China and Taiwan are economics-first, and economic interdependence would result in a new peaceful status quo.
The second way that Taiwan's move could alter the status quo is if Chen Shui-bian began to lean on his reputation as a politics-first leader and decided to liberalize trade with the hope that China would not coerce. A politics-first Taiwan would only do this if it believed China was economics-first.
What about complete liberalization if China was unlikely to coerce? Such questions would help us learn whether Taiwan voters are putting economics first or politics first.
The extended-form version (Figure 2) shows that a politics-first China will always coerce and then punish if given the chance, but an economics-first China will never punish if Taiwan refuses to comply.
And, China will coerce always, even if it is economics-first.
Equation (2) implies that an economics-first China will coerce Taiwan when (a) it perceives that Taiwan is more likely to be economics-first (the value of p is high), (b) the utility derived from attaining political concessions from Taiwan outweighs China's gains from cross-strait trade (y1-y2 is high), and (c) China does not suffer a high cost if Taiwan chooses not to comply and China does not punish Taiwan (y2-y3 is low).
China's strategy remains unchanged from El; it will coerce, even if it is economics-first.
E3 is another separating equilibrium, because although Taiwan will liberalize trade even if it is politics-first, China will only coerce if it is politics-first.
Equation (5) implies that an economics-first China will not coerce and a politics-first China will coerce if (a) China perceives that Taiwan is more likely to be politics-first (p is low), (b) there is little gain from attaining a political concession from Taiwan (y1-y2 is low), and (c) China suffers a high cost if it chooses not to punish Taiwan when Taiwan does not comply.