(redirected from affixes)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal.
Related to affixes: suffixes, prefixes
Like this video? Subscribe to our free daily email and get a new idiom video every day!

affix (one's) signature to (something)

To sign one's name to something, such as a document. Jason reads every contract thoroughly before affixing his signature to the bottom of it. Once you affix your signature to this last document, you'll be the owner of a brand-new car!
See also: affix, signature, to

affix (something) to (something)

To stick or fasten something on another object. Please affix stamps to these envelopes and then drop them in the mailbox.
See also: affix, to
Farlex Dictionary of Idioms. © 2015 Farlex, Inc, all rights reserved.

affix one's signature to something

to sign one's name on something. I affixed my signature to each of the documents.
See also: affix, signature, to

affix something to someone or something

to fasten or attach something to someone or something. Please affix these tags to your luggage.
See also: affix, to
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
See also:
References in periodicals archive ?
The analysis presented so far suggests that evaluative affixes are not heads, since they do not change the category of the base they combine with.
To sum up, in this paper, I commented on the headship status of evaluative affixes in Greek morphology.
While it seems that single-meaning affixes can occur, it also seems that affixes with multiple distinguishable meanings are more common.
Although we do not here have direct diachronic evidence, it seems that the are a few languages with monosemic affixes, and a lot with polysemic affixes which could imply that the move to polysemy is a case of diachronic development.
(ii) why do some affixes take prominence over others within the same set?
I have checked the combinations of evaluative affixes in dictionaries (Sabatini-Coletti and Zanichelli) but also on the WEB and in corpora personally collected (mainly from TV talks and newspapers).
iii) take affixes that express the same semantic category(s),
Phonological constraints are of especial relevance when they lead to the complementary distribution of affixes, as is the case of -ify and -ize (Plag 1999: 197, 228; see also Plag 2000: 10).
We should be careful to point out that the evidence that shows a BF effect in complex words only when these incorporate productive affixes is sparse.
In contrast with Bertram et al.'s (2000) study, we did not select a small number of derivative and inflectional affixes to carry out the experiment, but rather we concentrated on the case of derivative suffixes, selecting a broad sample of these (see Appendix A).
In that case, once the secondary-root-forming affixes beginning with []ya (provided in A.
Baayen 1992: 110-11) explains that affixes cannot be compared simply by contrasting their frequency, because not all affixes are freely attachable to a base (see 2).
Since the latter remains constant for the different affixes, in relative terms P* turns out to coincide with the simple number of hapaxes.
The system also suggests a kind of basic paradigmatic structure for affixal semantics, a series of classes defined for the simplex lexicon into which affixes may themselves fall.
For example, a well-known subtype of indirect insertion involves the addition of factitive/causative affixes (Wohlgemuth 2009: 97-98).