(redirected from Read George)
Also found in: Dictionary.
References in periodicals archive ?
I READ George Georgiou's letter (Sunday Mail, May 4) with some disbelief.
pounds 100 Letter IT was fascinating to read George Bingham's revelations about his father's disappearance.
My tongue was in my cheek when I read George Scheck's letter in which his father's Springfield was replaced by a Lee-Enfield, "an act for which my father never forgave the Army.
The human suffering caused by Stalinism is emphasized in high school English classes when students read George Orwellas Animal Farm, and many adults under forty would be hard-pressed to explain why Cubaas communist government presented aa clear and present dangera to democracy during the Cold War or why the United Statesa trade embargo is still a controversial topic for Cuban Americans and the Obama administration.
I have, however, read George Orwell's 1984 (the most lied about), and enjoyed it, and ploughed my way through Gustave Flaubert's Madame Bovary (16%) for a degree course.
THOSE WHO have read George Erickson's bestseller True North: Exploring the Great Wilderness by Bush Plane will know what to expect from his sequel--another exciting adventure in the far north from an experienced bush pilot with an inquiring, freethinking mind.
Several years ago I read George Orwell's essay "Politics and the English Language.
Dear Editor, I have read George Dobell's articles over the last two days and feel he has made exactly the points that I have heard at Edgbaston over the last two days.
This is the kind of double-speak that anyone who has read George Orwell's 1984 will clearly understand.
As I read George McGovern and William Polk's essay, "The Way out of War" [October], I remembered why I voted for McGovern in 1972.
We read George Orwell's 1984, which could happen in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union, but we could never have thought police and endless war here in the United States.
Anyone shocked by this should be required to read George Santayana ("Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Price gives us a new way to read George Eliot--as both a darling and distruster of anthologists--but she also prods us to think more generally about critics as anthologists at a moment when both new electronic texts and the accumulated body of criticism and theory threaten to overwhelm.
These days I don't get much chance to read, but when I do I like to read George Orwell's novels.
Now I read George is to put on three stone for his latest movie role.