While association between suspects may be relevant when deciding probable cause to arrest, association alone is never sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
75) The court informed the jury that if the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
any of the material elements of a particular crime, then it was the jury's duty to find Victor not guilty of that particular crime.
If the defendant did not prove (insert appropriate burden of persuasion) that the[office of the sheriff] [Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles] misinformed [him][her] or otherwise prevented [him][her] from complying, you should find [him] [her] guilty if all the elements of the charge have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt
Using these factors, the court found that no reasonable jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt
that the defendant was predisposed to sell drugs independent of the insistent and threatening actions of the informant.
and you also find beyond a reasonable doubt
that during the commission of the crime the defendant committed an aggravated battery, you should find the defendant guilty of (felony) with an aggravated battery.
If you find that the [begin strikethrough]state has proven the crime of[end strikethrough] defendant committed (crime charged or a lesser included crime) beyond a reasonable doubt
, but [begin strikethrough]has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt
that[end strikethrough] you are not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt
that [he] ]she] did so by intentionally selecting the victim based on [begin strikethrough]the defendant was motivated by[end strikethrough] prejudice, [begin strikethrough]to commit the crime[end strikethrough], then you should find the defendant guilty of only (crime charged or a lesser included crime).