References in periodicals archive ?
amp;') X may make Y suffer a harm, h, in doing a good deed, g, only if either (a) Y consents (or would consent) to X's doing so, (b) were Y in a position to bring about g at the cost of suffering h herself, Y would be morally required to bring about g and suffer h, or (c) X has no permissible alternative to doing so.
For Cohen, then, the harm principle is defensible independent of any consensus.
The person harmed regains some of what has been lost, the person who has done the harm contributes positively and the whole community benefits from greater safety and cohesion.
8220;We will also be covering implications and impact of on-going self harm, circumventing situations and circumstances leading to self harm behaviour.
The claim, therefore, behind the offense principle is one of universal privilege to hurt the feelings of others; it is not a factual claim that there is no harm at all.
One of the great attractions of harm as a subject is that it allows Linklater to build bridges between those pluralist accounts of international society concerned with mere coexistence and those that seek to ground and develop broader solidarist moral commitments.
Withholding highly efficacious medication because of inappropriate concerns about rare potential problems is as detrimental as profligate use of drugs with a narrow gap between benefit and harm.
She continued: "Self harm is an idea that is alien to a lot of people, as human beings go quite a long way to avoid pain, for instance we don't put our fingers in the fire a second time.
Civil society engagement has been variable in harm reduction initiatives in the region.
Perhaps most significant, there is now no time limit during which the predicted harm must occur.
harm can be used of anything that causes suffering or loss.
Most countries in the region responded to the increasing injection drug use with repressive measures that served to aggravate rather than alleviate harm related to drug use.
This second skin, meant to shield the self from further harm, nevertheless has the effect of inhibiting a fluid or balanced exchange between inside and outside, ultimately inhibiting relationality and communication with others (Turp, "Self-Harm" 235).
In the chapter on criminal theory in his recently published The Grammar of Criminal Law, George Fletcher distinguishes three "different foci for thinking about why conduct qualifies as crime": violating a duty, causing harm, and infringing a norm.
irreparable harm of an extraordinarily grave kind on others.