The impression this sort of liberal argument conveys to students -- wrongly, I would assert -- is that it is possible to
steer a middle course between the notion that what historians do is analyze a discourse (in all its verbal, visual and artifactual forms) according to a set of disciplinary conventions, and the position that historians uncover the truths of the past.
It's a judgment call, and we try to
steer a middle course.
Hoffmann states that Erasmus took his clue from the orthodox Fathers and sought to
steer a middle course between over-allegorizing and under-allegorizing, but he does not note that Erasmus frequently criticizes even his favorite Fathers, Origen, Jerome and Ambrose, for straying too far from the letter in their fanciful exegeses.